The CX-30 has standard Whiplash-Reducing Headrests, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash-Reducing Headrests system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Kicks doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-30. But it costs extra on the Kicks.
Both the CX-30 and Kicks have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the CX-30 Preferred/Carbon/Aire/Premium has Smart Braking Support - Rear Crossing (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Kicks’ Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the CX-30 and the Kicks have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Nissan Kicks:
|
CX-30 |
Kicks |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
148 |
476 |
Neck Injury Risk |
26.7% |
43.8% |
Neck Stress |
216 lbs. |
476 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
18 lbs. |
76 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
179 |
338 |
Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
33.5% |
67.5% |
Neck Stress |
172 lbs. |
253 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the CX-30 is much safer than the Kicks:
|
CX-30 |
Kicks |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
POOR |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Chest Rating |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Restraints |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Nissan Kicks:
|
CX-30 |
Kicks |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
60 |
124 |
Hip Force |
239 lbs. |
371 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
121 |
206 |
Spine Acceleration |
33 G’s |
56 G’s |
Hip Force |
623 lbs. |
669 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
161 |
303 |
Spine Acceleration |
40 G’s |
48 G’s |
Hip Force |
685 lbs. |
797 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Kicks:
|
CX-30 |
Kicks |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
89 |
158 |
Neck Tension |
156 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
45 lbs. |
67 lbs. |
Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.87 in |
1.02 in |
Shoulder Force |
223 lbs. |
245 lbs. |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
759 lbs. |
915 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
144 |
182 |
Neck Tension |
89 lbs. |
112 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
67 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.94 in |
1.5 in |
Shoulder Force |
245 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
1.34 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
379 lbs. |
669 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the CX-30 is 2.4% to 5.1% less likely to roll over than the Kicks.
The Mazda CX-30 has achieved the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) highest rating of “Top Safety Pick Plus” for the 2025 model year. This distinction is based on its exceptional performance in IIHS’ rigorous battery of safety tests. Specifically, it earned a “Good” rating in the latest, more stringent moderate overlap front crash test, a “Good” result in the updated side impact test, and a “Good” score in the revised pedestrian crash prevention test. The Kicks is not even a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2025.